The commenters I've published made some interesting points. but I've already answered everything so there's *yawn* no time to do it again. Do your own homework.
As you all saw, I defended myself from charges of being aharasser by printing an email I sent to Rachel. She didn't print all of it and that proves that I am not a liar and she is.
It's distressing to have to broadcast this stuff. But if you've been bombarded with thousands of abusive emails from Rachel where she accuses me, maliciously and vindictively of being, in her own words and I apologise for language like this, of being 'foolish'. I have never been so offended by such a spiteful evil cow who I've told to fu*ck off over twenty times in one day alone!.
Foolish? Well, we shall see who is the foolish one. I had to respond to such a grave and wild accusation. A response to which might look bad, but if you didn't provoke anything, it's definitely not an offence to be distressed and respond defensively, as someone's pointed out. Therefore it is Rachels fault I sent her such a rude email. She MADE me do it. I didn't want to be rude. Oh no. I wanted to be gentle. She made me do it. That's just how spiteful, vindictive, pathetic, malicious, self absorbed devious, malicious, stuck up, spiteful loser she is.
It's all her fault.
How many among you can never say you've never expressed your disgust or exhaustion with some vindictive, malicious, harasser and saboteur on email, or on the blogs? Well, I suppose you haven't, but I have. Often. Almost every day for the past few years. But I know for a fact a great many people spend their whole time sounding off on the web, and they think nothing of it.
It is perfectly acceptable for me to call Rachel all those names.
What is not acceptable is her calling me 'foolish'. That is beyond the pale and is harassment and evil psychopathic stalking in anyone's book.
So why the jeering and psycho blog abuse about me? It is extreme criminal harassment of me, as usual, and it has all been printed off. Ive even printed out the picture of my email I put up to show that they're even conspiring to make me harass myself. Maliciously.
Question: how on earth can she have maneuvered police?
The answer's two, nay threefold nay, hay nonny-nonny, and I have continually been giving it.
- Even though she has no friends and nobody likes her, she raised a mob, comprising of thousands of people
- She hypnotised police with a shiny big watch. This is blatantly apparent in the evidence.
- The police want to retain my hard drives and property, which is completely illegal on their part. My printing one email yesterday will prove to any sound mind that there are thousands of other abusive emails on my hard drive. There can be no other explanaition.The police are in league with everyone in the Oxford phone book to conspire against me. I wanted my name to be at the top of page 1 because it was important for serious researchers to contact me but they insisted, demanded in a very aggressive way that I had to be included alphabetically.
Bastards. I'll set my lawyers onto them.
A fairly heard defence case is/will be so strong, it would only have to lean against Big Ben for it to fall over. I continue to work this matter, and it is all going on ;-)...thank heaven for the beautiful weather, an overwhelming blessing.
But that's me. Blessed. And overwhelming.
My lawyers made sure of that.
It would have been quite enough having to deal with the Special Branch PR Unit on it's own. But of course I wouldn't have had to. Exactly what Special Branch officials opposed to my research needed, was for a small pack of stalking abusers to make false allegations about me which they could massively use as a lever to discredit me. In fact, they were fairly desperate for anything to use. And The Met are attempting to do exactly this.
Research Archive
Important Questions
Still Here
Time since my stalker threatened to delete this blog 'in an instant':
|