A Polite Response

Some one has asked me if I'm worried about printing remarks on my blog that show contempt for Rachel and her deceitful behaviour.

No, not really. My remarks are a response to a false accuser who has unscrupulously persecuted me and attacked my work, home and family. Responding to her libel and harassment campaign is fair enough. Abusing her and telling her to fu*ck off is the only response a reasonable person can have when she publicly called me 'foolish'. What an evil bitch, I've never seen such malise and spite in my life.

I tried to persuade Rachel not to a) liaise with known stalkers and saboteurs and b) make a malicious libel figure of herself, and was good to her for ages, despite her threats and abuse and slander and c) Do everything I told her or I would have her mown down. I was as gentle as only a highly educated and sofisticated person like me can be.

I told her what was allowed on her blog and I sent her many, many emails, politely advising her to stop her spiteful and malicious vendeta against me and my beautiful researcher. That ugly gibbon just wouldn't do what I gently advised her to do.

She went to police making false statements alongside known harassers and saboteurs in a malicious vendetta, and has been lying on the blogs ever since. She started it even though, as you can see in the emails I posted yesterday, I first reported her to the police. It's her fault the police were involved. Just because I start an investigation doesn't mean that I initiated it. Any fule kno that, but not the shrieking, spiteful goon that Rachel is.

My blogging this matter has been a response to the appalling treatment I've received at certain people's hands. I'm not going to take it lying down, that's all. I think that's fair enough. No one should be expected to. I'm going to have revenge. I know people. Rachel had better be careful.

I'm not going to let her and their slander campaign stand, and I'm not putting up with a malicious prosecution. The law doesn't apply to me. If I don't like the court's decision I am allowed to ignore it

She can bang on about how this blog is giving her a hard time and boo hoo at police about nothing if she likes. I find her statement about how this business has given her 'a relentless bloody nightmare' ridiculous. The court seems to think that this blog is evidence of me harassing her. The bloomin' cheek. Anyone reading this blog knows that I've only ever had kind, sweet and gentle words for Rachel.

What about the fact that she instigated every police manoeuvre that happened ( apart from the few moves that wrongdoing police instigated themselves), oh, and the complaint of mine that started everything off that I told you about yesterday?

If it has been a 'relentless bloody nightmare' for her, it's been the 'relentless bloody nightmare' of Lady Macbeth*. She knows she's guilty. She's talking about the consequences of her own actions there. The proof she's guilty is that I have been found guilty. Therefore she is the real guilty one. That's not too hard to understand is it?

She's posting things on her blog that are secret messages to me, criticising me and stalking me in a spiteful, malicious and vengeful way. The fact that she hasn't blogged anything atall recently is an example of the deep psychological warfare she is playing against me. The fact that she isn't mentioning me atall is further proof that she's harassing and sabotaging me all hours of every day. She just doesn't stop.

Batshit, barking, manipulative total crap. I am not, going to put up with it. I'm going to have her mown down.

She must be exterminated it's the only thing that will stop her current refusal to blog about me.