A Quick Word

I haven't got much time as I've been busy frolicking in the Sunlight, watching the golden rays caress my exhausted but still lovely skin. Actually my life is perfect right now and I'm having a wonderful time and I've never been happier. I bet Rachel's jealous of my life, but hasn't she always been? I think that's the reason behind her malicious vendetta. She knows she'll never be a researcher and that's why she's constantly going on and on and on about me. She's obsessed.

Obsessively so. But what can I do? I must 'ride the wave' of malice, and I have done so.

I see she's got an article in the Times. No matter. Nobody reads it and nobody likes the paper. I see that she constantly refers to me in the article. Not by name but using cunning code words to describe her malice towards me. Only a highly skilled researcher like me can see this. I don't blame the editor for letting this malicious sabotage get printed, he clearly isn't up to dealing with a vindictive witch like London Woman. The article itself is the most evil thing I've ever read, it's ghastly, utterly false in tone and uses words that she really should stay away from. She starts of by talking about her beautiful wedding and having 'hundreds' of friends and family. That's a lie. Nobody likes her and they were all turning up to laugh at her. I know.

But she will be dealt with during the retrial. I will not mention her again.

But I have written to Rupert Murdoch pointing out the failures of his editor and explaining that there have been some failures in leadership and that they need a superior researcher to do the job properly. I also lamented (good word that! I notice Rachel didn't use it once in her sad little article in such a minor publication. Just wait till I get my thesis published! The world may split apart, it's that revelatoriness that is a 'true' story not some tabloid muckraking).

Where was I? Oh yes, lamenting. I also told Rupert that his crime pages had absolutely nothing on the Ripper Murders committed by an evil gang trying to stop the Stewarts from reclaiming the British throne. I am expecting to be made Editor in Chief for the Times later today. Or possibly tomorrow morning. I predict with confidence that Rachel won't be getting any more publicity from this rag. Not when I'm in charge!

I have responded to her vendetta campaign, and I rode the tidal wave of her malice pretty well. But I loathe the subject. I think we'll all be saying a progressive goodbye to her throughout the rest of this year, and it's no bad thing. ;-)

I see that her stats have gone down. That's because all her readers know that she's an obsessed loon and have come over to my blog, my precious blog, my blog of truth and beauty.

Poor Rachel all alone and with no friends atall.

She won't get her inquiry into MI5. I know, I used to be their Director-General. Only I understand the security services as my research into Jack the Ripper made me an expert on terrorism and crime. Remember the Ipswich murders? I predicted that it was part of a heroin gang's turf war. I know they arrested a sad old man, but when the truth comes out I will be right. And if the truth doesn't come out, probably as a result of wrongdoings and corruption, I will still be right. Ask Rachel about those murders and she won't know anything at all. This is why she wasn't made DG of MI5. I know, I was on the interviewing panel. I've seen the files. I wrote the files. All 1,694,592 pages of them. All about Rachel.

These files will prove that she was obsessed with me.

My Lawyers are so busy reading them that they're not answering the phone anymore.